<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Blackberry on kenops</title><link>https://www.kenops.io/tags/blackberry/</link><description>Recent content in Blackberry on kenops</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.kenops.io/tags/blackberry/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Bold vs iPhone</title><link>https://www.kenops.io/posts/27/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:02:34 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.kenops.io/posts/27/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt="iphone-vs-blackberry-bold" loading="lazy" src="https://www.kenops.io/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/iphone-vs-blackberry-bold-300x195.jpg" title="iphone-vs-blackberry-bold"&gt;After buying both the iPhone and iPhone 3g, I became frustrated with the typical iPhone problems - spotty 3g network access, no cut-n-paste, etc. As a result, I was excited about the Bold and got one right when it came out. Having used a crackberry in the past was I confident that it would be the device for me.
I used the Bold for a number of days and learned an important lesson - Appreciate what you have. The Bold did not have all the answers, and after using the email and web interface on the Bold, I quickly realized that the iPhone was still the device to have.
Now I have a new appreciation for the iPhone. It has issues, no doubt. But the core functionality has yet to be challenged by any competitor.
After compiling a list of features and rating them, I posted the results at:
&lt;a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pLRnDwRBVmrELW9i6ug_-fw"&gt;http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pLRnDwRBVmrELW9i6ug_-fw&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>